However, the above mentioned observation is without prejudice into the legal rights of the parties, arising out in the over marriage with the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Compact fees use.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the uncovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this part for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Evidently distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion will involve a transfer into a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, offers financial relief by positioning an employee within a higher fork out scale, without modifying their occupation duties or position. It is a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same pay out scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they lack opportunities for promotion. Upgradation is really a policy tool used to relieve the hardship of extensive-term stagnation. Read more

Whilst there is no prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds small sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent within the home state, relevant case regulation from another state can be deemed because of the court.

In the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is definitely the highest court while in the United States. Reduce courts about the federal level include things like the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, plus the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related towards the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every single state has its individual judicial system that includes trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every state is often referred to as being the “supreme” court, Even though there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the The big apple Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, Whilst state courts may generally hear cases involving federal laws.

We've been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed because of the Constitution and laws of your United States and this State.

10. Without touching the merits of the case with the issue of yearly increases during the pensionary emoluments of the petitioner, in terms of policy decision with the provincial government, this sort of yearly increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment being made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.

The Cornell Regulation School website offers a variety of information on legal topics, such as citation of case regulation, and perhaps gives a video tutorial on case citation.

The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision and the statutes.[4]

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent and also the case under appeal, Maybe overruling the previous case law by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This read more may possibly transpire several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement in the concept of estoppel starting within the High Trees case.

States also ordinarily have courts that handle only a specific subset of legal matters, like family legislation and probate. Case legislation, also known as precedent or common legislation, could be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court and the precedent, case regulation may be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) isn't strictly bound to Stick to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a single district court in New York is not binding on another district court, but the original court’s reasoning might help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more